Size and money locked

Re has about $485 million locked in assets, making it the larger of the two platforms. Huma’s total value locked sits around $346 million, roughly $140 million less than Re. The difference in TVL reflects the relative scale of capital each protocol attracts.

Activity and fees

Both apps show no recorded 24‑hour trading volume, but they do collect fees from users. Re’s users paid roughly $78,000 in fees over the last day, while Huma’s fee intake was about $95,000. The higher fee total suggests more active usage or larger transactions on Huma despite its smaller TVL.

Networks and reach

Each protocol is deployed on four blockchains. Re runs on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and Avalanche, giving it a presence across major EVM ecosystems. Huma spans Solana, Ethereum, Stellar and Monad, offering a mix of both EVM and non‑EVM chains. Their comparable chain count means both have broad but distinct network footprints.

Who each one suits

Re may appeal to users who prefer a larger pool of locked capital and a modest fee environment, especially those interested in tokenized reinsurance assets. Huma could suit participants looking for higher fee‑driven activity and who value exposure to a diverse set of chains including Solana and Stellar.