Quick comparison
Concrete dominates in total value locked, holding roughly $1.15 billion compared with Convex’s $485 million. Convex, however, records higher daily fees, about $94 k versus Concrete’s $75 k. Both see a modest TVL decline over the past week, with Concrete down 6.7% and Convex down 4.8%.
Size and money locked
Concrete’s full‑stack yield infrastructure secures around $1.15 billion, reflecting a large pool of capital across its vault products. Convex Finance, focused on boosting Curve yields, holds about $485 million. The market capitalisation also differs, with Concrete at roughly $20 million and Convex at $160 million.
Activity and fees
Daily fee revenue shows Convex generating about $94 thousand, while Concrete collects roughly $75 thousand. Both platforms report zero 24‑hour trading volume in the data, indicating that fee collection comes from other yield‑related activities rather than direct swaps.
Networks and reach
Concrete operates on five networks: Ethereum, Stable, Arbitrum, Berachain and Katana. Convex Finance is present on four networks: Ethereum, Fraxtal, Arbitrum and Polygon. This broader chain coverage gives Concrete a slightly wider cross‑chain footprint.
Who each platform suits
Concrete’s large TVL and institutional‑grade vault design appeal to users seeking deep liquidity and sophisticated risk‑managed yield strategies across many chains. Convex’s higher fee generation and focus on Curve‑boosting make it attractive for participants looking to maximize returns from Curve pools, especially on the major networks it supports.